How to change life
As a mass audience, you’ve probably been exposed to romantic, comedic, and fantasy dramas during your lifetime, but even if you’ve never gone to school or taken a tog, you’ve probably now seen numerous television series. With this huge number of tastes, you must find yourself in a constant state of content searching… What can’t I tell you about, or isn’t in a popular show?
This question is also why education is arguably not at its best. If you’re interested in the value of good education and are an average school-going student, one can only see poor education as something which undermines the quality of life of children. Some of us might have thought to ourselves, “Well the education that I had at university isn’t really any better than the 1 I had at primary school”.
But there’s actually a significant difference between the quality of education and your general education. There are exactly 90 years of education in our modern society. We can’t simply label all of our fields and disciplines as bad and ignore their contribution to the world. Primary and secondary education have different classrooms, high school teachers, and academic sets of standards. And when you take a look at the education available to Londoners today compared to what it was back in the 1940s, it’s simply incredible.
With that said, many argue that today’s education isn’t at a level of quality that a skilled teacher can provide to the next generation. This isn’t all due to the work that teachers are currently doing. Yes, literacy and numeracy are very important, but it’s much more than that. Primary and secondary education both create broader and even more complex minds. The curriculum that’s currently being taught in primary and secondary schools across the country is very broad. This broadness means that we now have two groups of primary and secondary students who have very different educational attainment.
In the primary sector, you have pupils, and sometimes the level of education is so different from university, that some of your most valuable students don’t complete the primary school journey. With high-throughput and large schools, pupil-teacher ratios are extremely high.
So that leaves you with a school atmosphere which leaves you wondering if the standards from previous generations are really that similar with the expectations today. You get what you pay for, so why are these levels different?
For starters, the curriculum has become really broad over the past 40 years. Here, we are dealing with extremely broad subjects. Some of these topics include social and economic understanding, assessment, cultural development, communicating with the outside world, learning language skills, and even social knowledge. Again, you wouldn’t be surprised to see a society-wide focus on these young minds.
These topics are very long-term, demanding a history and culture-based approach. You can see how this narrow curriculum could ultimately lead to secondary and primary schools with no particular focus on this type of education.
As a result, secondary school pupils are getting great chunks of their education without gaining specific areas of education. These pupils have to be given specific abilities in arts and facilities to gain the most out of a curriculum. In this manner, we’re missing out on a number of skills that might be related to career development.
This all sounds like a lot of work but fortunately for the UK, the government has looked after the educational needs of secondary and primary school students. The ex-TEA report shows the following:
“The highest school achievers (all with ‘ACE’ in the gap) were the ones with less classroom instruction or observed within their year group”.
These pupils are also achieved with larger classroom environments, small classes, continuous feedback, and more frequent data.
Another fascinating fact about those who have the benefit of government funding to attend a secondary school is that their qualification is also difficult for some to attain. Looking specifically at secondary school pupils, around one third are in year 12.
We must appreciate that these pupils are working with a curriculum very similar to universities. It’s just a year or two less. So let’s not forget that you get what you pay for. The current government has instilled secondary schools with extra knowledge and wellbeing measures to ensure that they can maintain the quality of education without straying away from quality. For this, we must thank them.
Therefore, secondary and primary school students aren’t taught in a very different way, but they both have a background that is similar.
All said and done, secondary and primary school graduates aren’t at the top of the food chain. Without you wanting to boast on TV shows, you’re most likely there in secondary school. With student confidence and wellbeing at an all-time high, you can’t fault the secondary school curriculum for producing fun people

